Blog full o' bitter!

White working-class: Obama is okay except he is a black Muslim

Filed Under (Biased Media, Culture War, Politics) by Don C on 07-05-2008

Daily news liberal hack:

Such feelings leave Clinton and the Democratic Party in a tough spot. With the largest number of remaining delegates now being party insiders, they have to decide if Obama can overcome enough of that antipathy - essentially deciding if enough working-class whites will back away from the black candidate, whether because of the false Muslim rumors, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright flap or old-fashioned racism.

Hmmm. Who has proven the Muslim rumors to be false? How could such rumors be proven false?

I guess there is no way that working-class whites might back away from Barak because Barak is just another lying sack-of-shit liberal politician. Or because Barak has a Muslim name and we are at war with Muslims and he wants to surrender to Iran as soon as he takes office. Or because he hangs with terrorists (Ayres) and American hate mongers (Rev Wright and Michelle Obama.)

It would take an indefinite suspension of common sense for any American of any color to vote for Barak Obama.

McCain hit piece

Filed Under (Biased Media, Politics) by Don C on 23-04-2008

Shame on the LA Times:

McCain would be the oldest man to enter the White House if he is elected president, and questions have been raised about his health.

McCain has twice developed melanoma, a potentially deadly form of skin cancer.

The fact that he is legally designated with a disability pension may raise further questions.

Yes, and the LA Times is the one raising the questions. As proof the LA Times offers someone other than the LA Times raising the questions:

“It is a legitimate question to ask about the commander in chief: Is he fit to serve,” said Robert Schriebman, a senior Pentagon tax advisor and tax attorney who recently retired as a judge advocate for a unit of the California National Guard.

I think it’s also a legitimate question to ask about a LA Times “journalist”. Schriebman didn’t even say “presumptive” commander in chief. Or “candidate”. Schriebman might have been talking about Bush for all we know.

But the LA Times clears it up by paraphrasing what Schriebman actually meant to say:

If McCain can hike across the Grand Canyon, then why should he be getting disability payments from the government that are tax-exempt, Schriebman asked.

This guy works at the Pentagon? And where’s the direct quote on that? It would take a clueless individual, with exactly no tact, to bring up McCain’s disability pension.

Here is the best actual quote in the story. You know, something that someone actually said:

“I don’t know of any physical requirements to be commander in chief,” [former POW] Galanti said. “He would have a nice car to drive around in and a nice airplane to fly in.”

CBS figures hearsay better than outright lies

Filed Under (Biased Media) by Don C on 08-04-2008

A merger between CBS and CNN I can see. CBS outsourcing their news to CNN I can’t see so good. It’s smacks of desperation. After all, such an arrangement wouldn’t be news; it’d be hearsay.

NYT reporter to McCain: Why are you so angry?

Filed Under (Biased Media) by Don C on 08-03-2008

After getting slapped down like a bad puppy that went wee wee on the carpet, Elisabeth Bumiller follows up:

Bumiller: “Can I ask you… (long pause) why you’re so angry?”

McCain (incredulous): “Pardon Me?”

Bumiller (laughing like a teeny bopper as if at an inside joke): “Never mind, never mind.”

Maybe McCain seems angry because he can’t stand sniveling reporters who spend their life trying to spin bullshit propaganda out of thin air in support of their own petty political agendas. Seems like a more appropriate question might have been something along the lines of “What are you going to do about the Hamas cocksuckers when you’re president?”

So, If you don’t play gotcha with the New York Times and other MSM hacks , then you must be “so angry”. The AP says:

McCain is known for having a temper and has been dubbed “Senator Hothead” by more than one publication.

Like the transformation of Anakin skywalker into Darth Vader, the adorable little Senator Maverick will now be tranformed into Senator Hothead, Lord of the Sith.

Whether he is Right or Wrong on the issues, my suspicion is that McCain will be formidable opponent. I wouldn’t be surprised if the first thing McCain does is bomb the fuck out of North Vietnam.

Sometimes it’s OK to open fire on a school

Filed Under (Biased Media) by Don C on 07-03-2008

According to the BBC anyway:

The fact that the school is at the heart of the settler movement in the occupied West Bank may have been the reason why it was targeted, BBC Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen reports.

Many of its students are on special courses that combine religious study with service in combat units in the Israeli army, he notes.

I guess when someone opens fire on an auditorium full of students here in the U.S. it might be justified if some of those students were members of ROTC or the reserve forces. Of course the UN security council allowed Libya to hold up a condemnation of the attack. Why Libya is on the “security” council is anyone’s guess.

Here, there, and everywhere, diplomacy has failed, people.

Apples and Oranges

Filed Under (Biased Media, Tyranny at home) by Don C on 29-02-2008

No doubt we have too many laws in America and we are putting too many people in jail who are not threats to public safety. However, without including at least a footnote regarding the per capita executions I don’t see how the US per capita incarceration numbers are a valid comparison to those of your typical Dictatorship.

The report said the United States incarcerates more people than any other nation, far ahead of more populous China with 1.5 million people behind bars. It said the U.S. also is the leader in inmates per capita (750 per 100,000 people), ahead of Russia (628 per 100,000) and other former Soviet bloc nations which round out the Top 10. (Link)

Let’s not forget that Russia, China and other nations run by despots are known to round up people in the middle of the night who are not to be heard from again.

McCain hits back

Filed Under (Biased Media, Politics) by Don C on 22-02-2008

Frankly, I don’t see what’s so sophisticated about announcing the New York Times is a left-wing liberal rag.

Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign claimed vindication Thursday night after a sophisticated 24-hour counterattack turned a potentially lethal story in The New York Times into a conservative call to arms. (Link)

Effective, maybe, but sophisticated? Hardly.

Russia threatens

Filed Under (Russia, Biased Media) by Don C on 12-02-2008

Ivan is getting frisky

A U.S. military official says that one Russian Tupolev 95 flew directly over the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz twice, at a low altitude of about 2,000 feet, while another bomber circled about 58 miles out. The official was speaking on condition of anonymity because the reports on the flights were classified as secret.

Why would a Military official leak “Secret” material to an enemy? Isn’t that like espionage or something? Treason? I’m just wondering.

The tone of the story is almost giddy, as if the commies who write such stories have a spark of hope that Russia might again rise like the Phoenix to spread great and wonderful communist way life throughout the world.

The bombers were among four Russian Tupolev 95s launched from Ukrainka in the middle of the night, including one that Japanese officials say violated their country’s airspace over an uninhabited island south of Tokyo.

No harm, no foul, right. But of course we know whose at fault for the “heightened tensions” with the Russians

relations between the U.S. and Russia have deteriorated to their worst point since the Cold War, largely due to the United States’…

Tilting at Headlines

Filed Under (Biased Media, Politics) by Don C on 09-02-2008

What a difference a few weeks makes: “Obama Leads Clinton by Only 2 Delegates

Shouldn’t it be: SHOCKER! Hilary trails Obama inDelegate count!

more…

Peggy Noonan asks Can Hilary Lose Gracefully? Here is Hilary’s problem and why she is destined to lose the Democrat nomination: How does one trash a black man when much of one’s career is largely due to the bogus claim of helping blacks as well as the support from bogus “black leadership,” e.g., Sharpton and Jackson, because make no mistake, the Clintonista’s long-standing and successful formula for winning political battles is to destroy the opposition. We saw it in backfire in South Carolina.

How ironic that Hilary is faced with the Orwellian proposition that to win in to lose and to lose is to win.

Kim Gamel al-Husseini?

Filed Under (Biased Media) by Don C on 23-10-2007

At least I can get off Reuters for a change. Here we have reporter Kim Gamel’s AP story about the latest alleged Bin Laden tape that deserves a closer look to appreciate how these rats operate. Not Bin Laden, the journalists.

It’s a long story initially about Bin Laden’s tape but is really about alleged civilian deaths caused by the US military. Confirmed by unnamed “Iraqi officials”, naturally

The U.S. military, meanwhile, kept up pressure on Shiite Muslim militants as well.

Baghdad police said American helicopters strafed a building in the capital’s Sadr City district, wounding a woman and her daughter, the second claim in as many days of civilian casualties from U.S. attacks in the Shiite enclave.

Iraqi officials disputed an American military claim that 49 militants were killed Sunday in a ground and air assault that targeted an Iranian-linked militia chief, insisting the number of casualties was 15 - all civilians.

Yeah right. Name the Iraqi officials douche bag. Then the reporter drones on and on about how Muqtada calls for self-restraint in the face of “the crimes of the Americans.”

After another half a dozen paragraphs about Muqtada al-Sadr…

Al-Sadr later issued his own statement urging his Mahdi Army militia not to harm or kill fellow Iraqis. He also appeared to call on members of Iraqi government forces to stop cooperating with the U.S. military.

“You army and police of Iraq, don’t kill an Iraqi in the name of secular laws or in the name of ‘imposing the law,’” he said, using his phrase for the security crackdown in Baghdad and surrounding areas.

The U.S. military has said repeatedly that it welcomed al-Sadr’s order to his Mahdi Army fighters but pledged to continue its crackdown against what it says are breakaway factions that are being armed and trained by Iran.

One of those suspected faction leaders, who was accused of leading a kidnapping ring, was the target of Sunday’s raid. The military said he was not killed or captured.

Other Shiite neighborhoods in Baghdad were rattled by bombs Monday as at least 50 people were killed or found dead nationwide, according to police, hospital and morgue officials.

The figure included 25 bullet-riddled bodies, some decapitated, in a mass grave at Nadhum village in the mainly Sunni region around Lake Tharthar northwest of the capital. Police said the victims appeared to have been killed within the past three months.

…without a literal transition or other explanation those last two paragraphs lead the reader to infer that all the dead bodies and mass graves are the result of US military pressure as a result of the surge. Then believe it or not, it’s right back into the alleged civilian casualties. Names, ages, and sound bites:

“My poor wife and daughter. They didn’t commit any sin or mistake to suffer such serious wounds,” he said. “Who will take care and look after us. I feel a deep misery.”

The military said the U.S. ground and air assault in Sadr City on Sunday left “an estimated 49 criminals” dead, which would be one of the highest tolls for a single operation since Bush declared an end to active combat in 2003.

Iraqi officials maintained 15 civilians were killed, including a woman, a 14-year-old boy and two toddlers.

Again, with the “Iraqi officials.” Finally the last two paragraphs they bury the lede:

An Associated Press reporter counted 11 death certificates linked to the raid Sunday in Sadr City’s Imam Ali hospital, and hospital officials said one person died at the district’s General Hospital and three others at the neurology hospital in central Baghdad.

“At this time, we still have no evidence to suggest there are civilian casualties,” Lt. Justin Cole, a military spokesman, said Monday. He declined to comment on how the military determined 49 militants were killed, saying the information was classified.

Thirty-two paragraphs of propaganda and finally they finally tell you it’s all bullshit.

Make that tonnes (more…)

Filed Under (Biased Media) by Don C on 22-10-2007

The Reuters headline proclaims 19 tons of explosives found in Iraq. Inside the story it reads “nearly” nineteen tons.

U.S. forces in Iraq discovered nearly 19 tons of explosives in a weapons cache north of Baghdad this week, one of the biggest finds of its kind, the U.S. military said on Saturday.

I wonder if this discovery is reported the mainstream media and if so on what page. This particular Reuter’s story is six graphs, one of which contains directions to the cache and another two about how gory car bombs are. In the only paragraph that talks about what was found they misunderestimate:

The find was made up of 41,000 lbs of ammonium nitrate and 35 mortar bombs. U.S. forces destroyed the cache.

Even though Reuters didn’t indicate metric tonnes in the article the math is correct if you use 2,205 instead of 2,000 in your computations. Then stating the find was “nearly’ 19 tonnes is correct–if 35 mortar shells don’t weigh anything at all. But 6 inchers (155mm) weigh about 22 pounds each. They go up from there. Eight inch (203mm) shells weigh about 220 pounds. So 35 small shells would weigh nearly a half ton and 35 203mm shells would weigh well over three tons, metric or not.

I guess “nearly nineteen” sounds better than nearly twenty if you are constitutionally incapable of reporting anything good from Iraq.

Timothy McVeigh’s bomb was only about 5,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate. I bet if about thirty five bombs like McVeighs were to go off around Baghad the NYT, WaPo, and the rest of the mainstream media would run a Page 1 above the fold story around the clock until we surrendered.

Hurray for the surge. Remember come election time that the libs wanted to surrender unconditionally when all we needed to do was send over a mere 20,000 more troops. Wusses.

more… in regards to Iran’s threat of 11,000 missiles a minute…

I guess since this piece is pretty much a rant anyway I’ll go ahead and say that the Arabs need to thank Allah the next time they hit the mat — All Arabs should be thankful that the United States has a professional military and civilized civilian leadership (if not severely disabled) instead a bunch of ya-hoos like they have in charge of their command and control. Because their asses would have already been swatted down if we ran our operation anything like theirs.

If America were to issue a tank to any citizen of fighting age who requested one along with transport to whatever shithole they needed to go, there would come an end to the bullshit or everything gets blown to the ground. Spoils of war. Issue the Letters of Mark to make it all official. Bring the beautiful Persian women back home and treat them like, er, concubines? Heh. Leave the filth to rot in the Hell they brought down on themselves.

And don’t say that we can’t just turn a bunch of hotheads loose with state-of-the-art battle tanks, because I say we can, if we wanted to. It seems there will always be some scheming sack of shit lurking under every rock waiting to pounce on any opportunity for world domination. I don’t see why it would suddenly change. If you are not hitting these guys in the mouth they are scheming to stab you in the back, and eye, and neck. The dictator/tyrant types never go away either. They either win or they are killed. I think most normal people know this since it’s been proven over and over again. It’s the bully syndrome writ large.

If Saddam hadn’t been killed, he probably would have made a spring comeback this year with all the Democratic support he had in the House and Senate.

Close
E-mail It